'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South
There was less critical thinking on the subject of 'development' until it became popular in the 1950s. The proponents of 'development' in world politics ranged from modernization theorists to supporters of democratic development. Both the proponents used the term modernization, development and progress interchangeably in the context of third-world development. Today, in the development studies, where the dependency versus modernization rift still exists, there are other forms of development aspects that have continued to emerge. The 21st-century politics shows the rise of China as a potential competitor to the Western liberal order. The Chinese 'Beijing Consensus' has emerged as an alternative approach towards the dominant Western model of development. This paper uses a range of developmental models and theories to discuss the Politics of Development in the Global South over time and how the Western model of development differs from that of China in the ongoing US-China economic rivalry
-
Washington Consensus, Beijing Consensus, Global South, Development, Economic Rivalry
-
(1) Maryam Nawaz
MPhil Scholar, Department of International Relations at Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
(2) Shireen Mushtaq
Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations at Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Blackmer, D. L. M. (2009). Lucian W. Pye. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42(1), 213– 217. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20452405
- Chen, W. (2019, January). The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development. Academic.oup.com. https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/ 17/1/375/5485947
- Chin, G. T. (2016). Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Governance Innovation and Prospects. Global Governance, 22(1), 11–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44861178
- Blanchard, O., Fischer, S., & Cohen, D. (1992). Title: The Debt Crisis: A Postmortem The Debt Crisis: A Postmortem*. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 7(7), 0–262. https://www.nber.org/system/files/cha pters/c10991/c10991.pdf
- Data: Chinese Loans to Africa. (2021). China Africa Research Initiative. http://www.sais-cari.org/data-chinese- loans-to-africa
- De, B., & Santos, S. (2016). Epistemologies of the South and the future. FROM the EUROPEAN SOUTH, 1(1), 17–29. https://www.boaventuradesousasantos .pt/media/Epistemologies%20of%20th e%20south%20and%20the%20future_ Poscolonialitalia_2016.pdf
- Dollar, D. (2020, September 14). Reluctant player: China’s approach to international economic institutions. Brookings. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/rel uctant-player-chinas-approach-to- international-economic-institutions
- Dooley, M., & Easterly, W. (2003). Title: Managing Currency Crises in Emerging Markets Title: IMF and World Bank Structural Adjustment Programs and Poverty. University of Chicago Press, Publisher, 0–226. https://www.nber.org/system/files/cha pters/c9656/c9656.pdf
- He, B. (2016). A Discussion of Daniel A. Bell’s The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1), 147–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592715003 291
- Hönke, J., & Lederer, M. (2013). Development and international relations. https://pure.rug.nl/ws/portalfiles/porta l/40230087/H_nkeLederer2013_Develo pmentandIR_finalauthors_version.pdf
- Huang, Y. (2010). Debating China’s Economic Growth: The Beijing Consensus or The Washington Consensus. Academy of Management Perspectives, 24(2), 31–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25682397
- Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). Why the Liberal World Order Will Survive. Ethics & International Affairs, 32(1), 17–29.
- Kaminsky, G. L., & Pereira, A. (1996). The debt crisis: lessons of the 1980s for the 1990s. Journal of Development Economics, 50(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304- 3878(96)00002-8
- Lahdenperä, J., & Humayoun, S. (2010). http://www.diva- portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2% 3A327908. DIVA. https://www.diva- portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2 %3A327908&dswid=-617
- Levander, C., & Mignolo, W. (2011a). Introduction: The Global South and World Dis/Order. The Global South, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.5.1.1
- Lippert, B., & Perthes, V. (2020). SWP Research Paper Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs Strategic Rivalry between United States and China Causes, Trajectories, and Implications for Europe. https://www.swp- berlin.org/publications/products/resea rch_papers/2020RP04_China_USA.pdf
- Lopes, C. (2012). Economic Growth and Inequality: The New Post-Washington Consensus*. RCCS Annual Review, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.4000/rccsar.426
- Marangos, J. (2009). What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(1), 197– 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07. 007
- Morrison, W. M. (2019). CHINA’S ECONOMIC RISE: HISTORY, TRENDS, CHALLENGES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES * - ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/openview/3af95 d985e9356389332c19624b0214e/1?pq- origsite=gscholar&cbl=2034884
- Moss, T., & Rose, S. (2006). China ExIm Bank and Africa: new lending, new challenges. Center for Global Development. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/38231/20 06_11_06.pdf
- Öner, S. (2003). A BRIEF ANALYSIS OF FUKUYAMA’S THESIS “THE END OF HISTORY?†https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/ar ticle-file/100889
- Pye, L. W. (1965). The Concept of Political Development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 358(1), 1–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1036351
- Renwick, N., Gu, J., & Hong, S. (2018). China and African Governance in the Extractive Industries. International Development Policy | Revue Internationale de Politique de Développement, 10(10.1). https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.2547
- Runde, D. F. (2020). US Foreign Assistance in the Age of Strategic Competition. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). http://csis-website- prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs- public/publication/20514_Runde_Forei gnAssistance_v3_FINAL.pdf
- Singh Puri, H. (2010). Rise of the Global South and Its Impact on South-South Cooperation.Agris.fao.org https://agris.fa o.org/agris- search/search.do?recordID=US2014606 620
- Stewart, F. (2009). The Brandt Report. The IDS Bulletin, 12(2), 36–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759- 5436.1981.mp12002010.x
- Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). THE CHINESE CENTURY | Vanity Fair. Vanity Fair | The Complete Archive. https://archive.vanityfair.com/article/2 015/1/the-chinese-century
- Taylor, C. (1984). Foucault on Freedom and Truth. Political Theory, 12(2), 152–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/191359
- U.S. Department of State. (2021). U.S. Foreign Assistance to the Developing World. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.
- Vadell, J., Brutto, G. L., & Leite, A. C. C. (2020). The Chinese South-South development cooperation: an assessment of its structural transformation. Revista Brasileira de PolÃtica Internacional, 63(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034- 7329202000201
- Williamson, J. (2000). What Should the World Bank Think about the Washington Consensus? The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/15.2.251
- International Debt Statistics (IDS). (2021). World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/progra ms/debt-statistics/ids
- YAÄžCI, M. (2016). A Beijing consensus in the making: The rise of Chinese initiatives in the international political economy and implications for developing countries. Perceptions: Journal of International Affairs. http://sam.gov.tr/pdf/perceptio ns/Volume-XXI/Summer- 2016/Perceptions_Summer2016-2.pdf
- Yao, Y. (2011). Beijing Consensus Or Washington Consensus. Development Outreach, 13(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020- 797x_13_1_26
- Yu, H. (2016). Motivation behind China’s “One Belt, One Road†Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Journal of Contemporary China, 26(105), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2016.1 245894
Cite this article
-
APA : Nawaz, M., & Mushtaq, S. (2023). 'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII(I), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2023(VIII-I).06
-
CHICAGO : Nawaz, Maryam, and Shireen Mushtaq. 2023. "'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII (I): 57-72 doi: 10.31703/gsssr.2023(VIII-I).06
-
HARVARD : NAWAZ, M. & MUSHTAQ, S. 2023. 'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII, 57-72.
-
MHRA : Nawaz, Maryam, and Shireen Mushtaq. 2023. "'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII: 57-72
-
MLA : Nawaz, Maryam, and Shireen Mushtaq. "'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII.I (2023): 57-72 Print.
-
OXFORD : Nawaz, Maryam and Mushtaq, Shireen (2023), "'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South", Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VIII (I), 57-72
-
TURABIAN : Nawaz, Maryam, and Shireen Mushtaq. "'Old' And 'New' Consensus Amidst Us-China Economic Rivalry In The Global South." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review VIII, no. I (2023): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2023(VIII-I).06