ARTICLE

THE DOCTRINE OF USE OF FORCE IN SELFDEFENSE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW PROSPECTS AND CONTOURS

  1. HOME
  2. ARTICLE

02 Pages : 13-20

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02      10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02      Published : Mar 2022

The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours

Abstract

    The law on "Use of Force in Self-Defense under International Law" aims to secure both state sovereignty and international peace. This is not only one of the most significant doctrines developed by the United Nations (UN) but is also most challenging to implement in true spirit as its interpretation often get spoliticised. The controversies spark not on the legality of self-defense but on proper identification of the circumstances under which it applies, and the debate continues till date (Azubuike, 2011). Hence changing interpretations of this norm by states continue to arise different response and threats every time this notion is applied. The present article is an effort to analyse the true meaning of the doctrine of "use of force (UOF) in self-defense (SD)", it highlights the scope of SD, and examines its various aspects. The article concludes that while the principles on UOF in SD are very well drafted, there exist an immense need to understand the applicability of this norm, the willingness of states to exercise it in its true spirit, and collective effort by states, international organizations, and the UN can prove effective in this respect.

    Use of Force, Self-Defense, International Law, Human Rights, Obligations

    (1) Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan Arif
    Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
    (2) Bushra Bannian
    Lecturer, Department of Law, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Kotli, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan.
    (3) Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi
    Assistant Professor, Department of Law, University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Muzaffarabad, AJK, Pakistan.
Fulltext PDF

References

  • Abresch, W. (2005). A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 741-767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139
  • Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, (1990). Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September, para.9.
  • Canadian Forces Armed Assistance Directions, (1993). P.C. 1993-624, 30 March.
  • Corn, G. (2010). Mixing Apples and Hand Grenades The Logical Limit of Applying Human Rights Norms to Armed Conflict. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 1(1), 52-94. https://doi.org/10.1163/187815210x1276 6020139802
  • Dinstein, Y. (1990).
  • European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, (1950). Arts. 15(2). Article 6(1).
  • Eustace, A. C. (2011). https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/c gi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150
  • Expert Meeting on the Right to Life in Armed Conflict and Situations of Occupation, held at University Centre for International Humanitarian Law Geneva, 1-2 September, (2005), 22-23.
  • Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 31.
  • Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S.
  • Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 135.
  • Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 85.
  • Hague Regulations, (1907). Arts. 42, 43.
  • ICJ (1986). Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v USA), Merits, ICJ Reports 14.
  • ICJ (1996). Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Rep. 226.
  • ICJ (2004). Advisory opinion of ICJ in Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 9 July, para.139.
  • ICJ (2005). Case concerning Armed Activities on the territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda, Merits, ICJ Rep
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (1966). Article 6(1).
  • Israel v. Government of Israel, HCJ 769/02, Judgment of Israeli High Court of Justice (HCJ), Public Committee Against Torture on 11 December, (2005), para. 40.
  • Jurasz, O. (2019).
  • Khdir, R. (2016).
  • McCann and others vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 18984/91, Judgment of European Court of Human rights (ECtHR) on 27 September, (1995), para. 148.
  • McKerr vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 28883/95, ECtHR's Judgment on 4 May, (2001), para. 100.
  • Meron, T. (2000).
  • Padmanabhan, A. & Shih, M. (2012).
  • Prosecutor v Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-T, ICTY's judgment, 26 February, (2001), para. 451.
  • Report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations September, (2005).
  • Republic of Iran v United States of America case. (2003).
  • Rome Statute, (1998). Art. 31(1)(c).
  • Sassoli, M. & Olson, L. M. (2008).
  • Sassoli, M. (2005).
  • Upeniece V. (2018).
  • Wilmshurst, E. (2006).

Cite this article

APA

    APA : Arif, S. M. W. K., Bannian, B., & Gardazi, S. M. F. (2022). The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII(I), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02

CHICAGO

    CHICAGO : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. 2022. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII (I): 13-20 doi: 10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02

HARVARD

    HARVARD : ARIF, S. M. W. K., BANNIAN, B. & GARDAZI, S. M. F. 2022. The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII, 13-20.

MHRA

    MHRA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. 2022. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII: 13-20

MLA

    MLA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII.I (2022): 13-20 Print.

OXFORD

    OXFORD : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bannian, Bushra, and Gardazi, Syed Mudasser Fida (2022), "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours", Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII (I), 13-20

TURABIAN

    TURABIAN : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review VII, no. I (2022): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02