THE DOCTRINE OF USE OF FORCE IN SELFDEFENSE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW PROSPECTS AND CONTOURS

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02      10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02      Published : Mar 2022
Authored by : Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan Arif , Bushra Bannian , Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi

02 Pages : 13-20

References

  • Abresch, W. (2005). A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 741-767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139
  • Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, (1990). Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September, para.9.
  • Canadian Forces Armed Assistance Directions, (1993). P.C. 1993-624, 30 March.
  • Corn, G. (2010). Mixing Apples and Hand Grenades The Logical Limit of Applying Human Rights Norms to Armed Conflict. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 1(1), 52-94. https://doi.org/10.1163/187815210x1276 6020139802
  • Dinstein, Y. (1990).
  • European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, (1950). Arts. 15(2). Article 6(1).
  • Eustace, A. C. (2011). https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/c gi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150
  • Expert Meeting on the Right to Life in Armed Conflict and Situations of Occupation, held at University Centre for International Humanitarian Law Geneva, 1-2 September, (2005), 22-23.
  • Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 31.
  • Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S.
  • Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 135.
  • Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 85.
  • Hague Regulations, (1907). Arts. 42, 43.
  • ICJ (1986). Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v USA), Merits, ICJ Reports 14.
  • ICJ (1996). Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Rep. 226.
  • ICJ (2004). Advisory opinion of ICJ in Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 9 July, para.139.
  • ICJ (2005). Case concerning Armed Activities on the territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda, Merits, ICJ Rep
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (1966). Article 6(1).
  • Israel v. Government of Israel, HCJ 769/02, Judgment of Israeli High Court of Justice (HCJ), Public Committee Against Torture on 11 December, (2005), para. 40.
  • Jurasz, O. (2019).
  • Khdir, R. (2016).
  • McCann and others vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 18984/91, Judgment of European Court of Human rights (ECtHR) on 27 September, (1995), para. 148.
  • McKerr vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 28883/95, ECtHR's Judgment on 4 May, (2001), para. 100.
  • Meron, T. (2000).
  • Padmanabhan, A. & Shih, M. (2012).
  • Prosecutor v Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-T, ICTY's judgment, 26 February, (2001), para. 451.
  • Report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations September, (2005).
  • Republic of Iran v United States of America case. (2003).
  • Rome Statute, (1998). Art. 31(1)(c).
  • Sassoli, M. & Olson, L. M. (2008).
  • Sassoli, M. (2005).
  • Upeniece V. (2018).
  • Wilmshurst, E. (2006).
  • Abresch, W. (2005). A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 741-767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139
  • Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials, (1990). Adopted by the Eighth United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders. Havana, Cuba, 27 August to 7 September, para.9.
  • Canadian Forces Armed Assistance Directions, (1993). P.C. 1993-624, 30 March.
  • Corn, G. (2010). Mixing Apples and Hand Grenades The Logical Limit of Applying Human Rights Norms to Armed Conflict. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies, 1(1), 52-94. https://doi.org/10.1163/187815210x1276 6020139802
  • Dinstein, Y. (1990).
  • European Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, (1950). Arts. 15(2). Article 6(1).
  • Eustace, A. C. (2011). https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/c gi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1150
  • Expert Meeting on the Right to Life in Armed Conflict and Situations of Occupation, held at University Centre for International Humanitarian Law Geneva, 1-2 September, (2005), 22-23.
  • Geneva Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 31.
  • Geneva Convention (II) for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S.
  • Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 135.
  • Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 12 Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 12 August, (1949), 75 U.N.T.S. 85.
  • Hague Regulations, (1907). Arts. 42, 43.
  • ICJ (1986). Case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v USA), Merits, ICJ Reports 14.
  • ICJ (1996). Advisory Opinion on the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, ICJ Rep. 226.
  • ICJ (2004). Advisory opinion of ICJ in Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 9 July, para.139.
  • ICJ (2005). Case concerning Armed Activities on the territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda, Merits, ICJ Rep
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, (1966). Article 6(1).
  • Israel v. Government of Israel, HCJ 769/02, Judgment of Israeli High Court of Justice (HCJ), Public Committee Against Torture on 11 December, (2005), para. 40.
  • Jurasz, O. (2019).
  • Khdir, R. (2016).
  • McCann and others vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 18984/91, Judgment of European Court of Human rights (ECtHR) on 27 September, (1995), para. 148.
  • McKerr vs. United Kingdom, Application no. 28883/95, ECtHR's Judgment on 4 May, (2001), para. 100.
  • Meron, T. (2000).
  • Padmanabhan, A. & Shih, M. (2012).
  • Prosecutor v Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, Case No. IT-95-14/2-T, ICTY's judgment, 26 February, (2001), para. 451.
  • Report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations September, (2005).
  • Republic of Iran v United States of America case. (2003).
  • Rome Statute, (1998). Art. 31(1)(c).
  • Sassoli, M. & Olson, L. M. (2008).
  • Sassoli, M. (2005).
  • Upeniece V. (2018).
  • Wilmshurst, E. (2006).

Cite this article

    APA : Arif, S. M. W. K., Bannian, B., & Gardazi, S. M. F. (2022). The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII(I), 13-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02
    CHICAGO : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. 2022. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII (I): 13-20 doi: 10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02
    HARVARD : ARIF, S. M. W. K., BANNIAN, B. & GARDAZI, S. M. F. 2022. The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours. Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII, 13-20.
    MHRA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. 2022. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII: 13-20
    MLA : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII.I (2022): 13-20 Print.
    OXFORD : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bannian, Bushra, and Gardazi, Syed Mudasser Fida (2022), "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours", Global Strategic & Security Studies Review, VII (I), 13-20
    TURABIAN : Arif, Sardar M.A. Waqar Khan, Bushra Bannian, and Syed Mudasser Fida Gardazi. "The Doctrine of Use of Force in Self-defense and International Law: Prospects and Contours." Global Strategic & Security Studies Review VII, no. I (2022): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsssr.2022(VII-I).02